Reisenfeld & Co. v. Network Group
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
277 F.3d 856 (2002)
In 1989, Builders Square, Inc. and its parent company, K Mart Corporation (collectively, BSI) (defendants), entered into a contract with a real estate broker, the Network Group (Network) (defendant) for Network to assist with the sale or sublease of K Mart stores. In June 1994, Network entered into a commission agreement with Reisenfeld (plaintiff), a real estate broker that represented Dick’s Clothing & Sporting Goods (Dick’s). Under the commission agreement, Network would pay Reisenfeld a commission if Dick’s concluded a sublease agreement with BSI. In November 1994, BSI and Dick’s entered into a sublease agreement under which Dick’s subleased two BSI properties. Under the agreement, BSI would pay a commission to Network, and Network would pay part of that commission to Reisenfeld pursuant to a separate agreement between BSI and Reisenfeld—no such agreement was entered into, however. Mark Aronds, the sole shareholder of Network, was convicted on criminal charges that stemmed from Aronds defrauding BSI. The court ordered Network to disgorge any commissions received from BSI and relieved BSI of the duty to pay any outstanding commissions owed to Network. Reisenfeld sued BSI and Network for nonpayment of commissions owed to Reisenfeld under the agreements. The court granted summary judgment for Reisenfeld against Network but granted summary judgment for BSI on Reisenfeld’s claim against BSI. Reisenfeld appealed the grant of summary judgment for BSI, arguing that Reisenfeld could seek payment from BSI based on a quasi-contract theory, even though Reisenfeld and BSI had not entered into a contract.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Boggs, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 705,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.