Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Rogers v. Runfola & Associates, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court
565 N.E.2d 540 (1991)


Barbara Rogers and Nicholas Marrone (plaintiffs) worked as court reporters at Runfola & Associates, Inc. (Runfola) (defendant), which was owned by Thomas Runfola (defendant). Runfola was located in Columbus, Ohio in Franklin County. Rogers worked for Runfola as an at-will employee for a number of years while attending court-reporting school. Later, however, both Rogers and Marrone signed employment contracts with Runfola that included covenants not to compete. In these non-compete agreements, Rogers and Marrone agreed that they would not have any involvement in the court-reporting business within Franklin County for two years after leaving Runfola, and that they would never solicit business from Runfola clients. Nevertheless, after working at Runfola for more than a decade, Rogers and Marrone decided to leave and open their own court-reporting company. Rogers and Marrone sued Runfola, asking the court to declare that the covenants not to compete were unenforceable. Rogers and Marrone argued that there was insufficient consideration to support the covenants. Runfola, on the other hand, asked the court to enjoin Rogers and Marrone from violating the covenants. Runfola argued that damages could not be easily determined but were at least $100,000. The trial court ruled that the covenants were unenforceable. Runfola appealed. Rogers and Marrone continued to operate their business for two years before the case reached the Ohio Supreme Court.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial