United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
248 F.3d 621 (7th Cir. 2003)
Thompson (plaintiff) appealed from a jury verdict against her in a Title VII racial discrimination suit against her employer, Altheimer & Gray (defendant). Thompson argued that a juror, Leiter, should have been struck for cause. When asked during voir dire whether there was anything that would prejudice her decision, Leiter stated that as a business owner she would tend to favor the defendant and that her experiences with employees suing simply because they failed to get a promotion or raise might “cloud” her judgment. However, the juror stated that she would do her best to be fair. Having exhausted three preemptory challenges, Thompson’s attorney had requested the court to strike Leiter for cause. The court refused and Leiter was able to remain on the jury.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
Concurrence (Wood, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.