Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Throop v. F.E. Young & Company

Supreme Court of Arizona
382 P.2d 560 (1963)


Facts

While driving along a highway, Peter Hennen, a salesman for F.E. Young & Company (Young) (defendant), swerved into an oncoming lane. Hennen’s vehicle struck a car driven by Vernon Throop in a head-on collision. Both men were killed in the accident. Marie Throop (plaintiff), Vernon’s wife, filed a wrongful-death action against Young and Robert Stauffer, the administrator of Hennen’s estate (defendant). Throop alleged that Young, as Hennen’s employer, was equally responsible for Hennen’s negligent conduct. At trial, the evidence showed that Hennen was given great discretionary authority over important details regarding his work. Hennen had no in-office duties, controlled all the details regarding his sales trips, and only visited the Young office a few times annually. At the close of the evidence, Hennen and Young each moved for a directed verdict. The trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of Young but denied Hennen’s motion. The jury held for Throop and awarded damages in the amount of $50,400. Throop appealed the trial court’s directed verdict in favor of Young. Stauffer appealed the jury’s verdict.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (McCarthy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.