1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County Court
Oregon Supreme Court
742 P.2d 39 (1987)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
The Wasco County Board of Commissioners (the county) (defendant) approved, in a 2-1 decision, an election on the incorporation of the City of Rajneeshpuram. One of the county commissioners had previously sold cattle to certain proponents of the incorporation at a higher-than-market price and with irregularities to quality, weight, and transportation of the cattle. The commissioner did not make the sale public and did not disclose his prior dealings with the proponents of incorporation when voting in favor of the election. Those who opposed the election challenged the county’s decision before the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), arguing that the decision should be set aside due to bias of one of the commissioners. LUBA found that although the sale of the cattle involving the commissioner was somewhat irregular, there was no evidence that the transaction was contingent upon the commissioner’s vote or that the sale was so one-sided as to constitute a sham. LUBA found that the facts did not rise to the level of a conflict of interest. Opponents of the election challenged the county’s decision in court and appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals, which reversed LUBA’s decision and found that the decision was quasi-judicial and required impartial board members. The court of appeals found that due to his prior dealings, the commissioner’s participation in the vote tainted the county’s decision. The county appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Linde, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.