1025 Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. Marymount School of New York
New York Supreme Court
123 Misc. 2d 756 (1983)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Marymount School (Marymount) (defendant) occupied three buildings in the Metropolitan Museum Historic District. The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (commission) (defendant) had aesthetic jurisdiction over buildings in the historic district. Marymount’s buildings were not designated landmarks. 1025 Fifth Avenue, Inc. (1025) (plaintiff) owned two apartment buildings adjacent to Marymount’s buildings. Marymount applied to the commission for permission to build a rooftop gymnasium, which would allow the school to provide physical-education classes on-site. The commission granted permission to Marymount and issued a notice to proceed. Subsequently, 1025 filed a petition for an Article 78 proceeding to challenge the commission’s actions. 1025 alleged that the commission lacked authority to issue the notice to proceed because the relevant statute provided the commission with authority to rule on the demolition of non-landmark buildings in historic districts but not on alterations to such buildings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greenfield, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.