1165 Broadway Corp. v. Dayana of N.Y. Sportswear, Inc.
New York City Civil Court
166 Misc. 2d 939 (1995)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
Police officers executed search warrants for different rooms located at 1165 Broadway in New York City and recovered counterfeit goods in each premises. The commercial landlord, 1165 Broadway Corporation (Broadway) (plaintiff), leased the rooms to Dayana of N.Y. Sportswear, Inc. (Dayana) (defendant), manufacturers and sellers of apparel and sportswear. Broadway commenced summary holdover proceedings against Dayana at the request of the New York county district attorney’s office. Broadway claimed that Dayana was using the leased premises for the manufacture of counterfeit trademark clothing in violation of state penal law. Broadway argued that Dayana’s possession for the sale of counterfeit trademark items was an illegal trade, manufacture, or business that voided the lease under New York Real Property Law § 231(1) and entitled Broadway to immediate possession in a summary proceeding brought under New York RPAPL 715(1). Broadway sought possession of the commercial premises in the summary proceeding. Dayana moved to dismiss the summary proceeding on the grounds that the state legislature did not intend for these laws to be used to prohibit the illegal manufacture and sale of counterfeit trademark goods. Dayana argued that these statutes applied only if the commercial premises were being used to promote moral wrongs dangerous to the other tenants in the building or in the neighborhood.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bransten, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.