Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

936 Second Avenue L.P. v. Second Corporate Development Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York
891 N.E.2d 289 (2008)


Facts

In 1966, Second Corporate Development Company, Incorporated (Corporate Development) (defendant) signed a 20-year net lease to rent a New York City mixed-use property from the predecessor-in-interest to 936 Second Avenue L.P. (936 Second) (plaintiff). The rent for each 10-year renewal term was to be calculated at 7 percent of the value of the property. In 2005, the parties renewed the lease for a new, 20-year term, but were unable to agree on the value of the property for purposes of calculating rent due over the next 10-year period. Each party hired an appraiser. The appraiser for Corporate Development valued the property at $7.1 million; the appraiser for  936 Second set the value much lower, at $3.43 million. The appraiser for 936 Second had included the net lease in calculating property value, but the appraiser for Corporate Development had not. Unable to agree on the amount of rent, 936 Second sought a declaratory judgment that the lease and its terms and conditions must be considered when calculating the value of the property to determine the amount of rent. Corporate Development counterclaimed, seeking a declaratory judgment that the lease should not be considered in the property’s appraisal. Both parties moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Corporate Development, holding that a lease need not be considered in calculating the value of property. The appellate division affirmed. 936 Second appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Graffeo, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.