A and B v. Israel
Israel Supreme Court
CrimA 3261/08, ILDC 1069 (2008)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
A and B (defendants) were inhabitants of Gaza who were placed under administrative detention by Israel in 2002 and 2003, respectively. The detentions were reviewed and upheld by the Gaza Military Court. In September 2005, Israel ended military rule in the Gaza Strip, and internment orders were issued against A and B under the Internment of Unlawful Combatants Law (the law). The law gave Israel the power to detain “unlawful combatants,” defined as individuals who participated in hostilities or were members of forces that carried out hostilities against Israel and did not meet the criteria to be classified as prisoners of war. A and B challenged their detentions, but the Tel-Aviv-Jaffa District Court (the district court) concluded that the internment orders under the law were proper because releasing A and B would harm state security. A and B appealed to the Israel Supreme Court, but the appeal was denied. The supreme court’s judgment noted that A and B were members of Hezbollah, which was still engaging in hostilities with Israel, and that A and B had participated in covert actions against Israeli citizens prior to the detentions. The judgment noted that A and B posed a threat and could return to their previous activities if released. In accordance with the law, the district court subsequently conducted periodic reviews of the detentions and found that the detentions continued to be justified given A’s and B’s associations with Hezbollah and the risks that A and B would return to terrorist activities if released. A and B appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Beinisch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.