A Bill Titled “Provincial of the Teaching Sisters of the Holy Cross of the Third Order of Saint Francis in Menzingen of Sri Lanka (Incorporation)”

S.C. Special Determination No. 19/2003 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

A Bill Titled “Provincial of the Teaching Sisters of the Holy Cross of the Third Order of Saint Francis in Menzingen of Sri Lanka (Incorporation)”

Sri Lanka Supreme Court
S.C. Special Determination No. 19/2003 (2003)

  • Written by Nathan Herkamp, JD

Facts

The Teaching Sisters of the Holy Cross of the Third Order of Saint Francis in Menzingen of Sri Lanka (the Sisters) (defendants) sought legal incorporation in Sri Lanka. A member of the Sri Lankan parliament introduced a bill that would grant the incorporation to the Sisters. The Sisters intended to found Catholic churches, schools, orphanages, clinics, and homes for the aged. The bill also stated that the purpose of the corporation would be to teach and spread religion, specifically Catholicism. Anula Fernando (plaintiff) petitioned the Sri Lanka Supreme Court for a determination that the bill would violate article 10 of the Sri Lankan constitution, which provided for the freedom of religion. Fernando, who was joined by the Sri Lankan attorney general (plaintiff), claimed that because the Sisters would be providing material benefits to children, indigents, and the elderly, the Sisters would be coercing vulnerable people to adopt Catholicism. Fernando also argued that the ordinance violated article 9 of the constitution. Article 9 acknowledged Buddhism as the primary religion in Sri Lanka, and it protected the Buddha Sasana. Fernando argued that the effect of article 9 is to support the Buddha Sasana in Sri Lanka without reducing the freedom of religion guaranteed in article 10 of the constitution. Although Sri Lankans were entitled to practice any religion, propagating Christianity or any religion other than Buddhism harmed the Buddha Sasana. The petition was heard by the Sri Lankan Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership