A. Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 689 (1923)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
A. Bourjois (plaintiff) purchased for a large sum the United States business, including the goodwill and trademarks, of a French face powder manufacturer. Thereafter, A. Bourjois continued to sell the imported French face power in the United States, using a similar box and label as its predecessors, but taking pains to conduct its sales efforts in a fashion suitable for Americans. The business did so well that the public understood the box and labels to mean the face powder of A. Bourjois. Desiring to reap the benefits of a favorable exchange rate, Katzel (defendant) imported the same face powder from France and thereafter sold it in the United States using boxes and labels similar to those of A. Bourjois. The district court enjoined Katzel’s sale of the French face powder in the United States, but the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed after concluding that Katzel had not infringed because his product was the genuine French face powder. The United States Supreme Court grated a writ of certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.