A.H. Fetting Manufacturing Jewelry v. Waltz
Maryland Court of Appeals
152 A. 434 (1930)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Ada Waltz (plaintiff) rented a building to A.H. Fetting Manufacturing Jewelry (defendant) for a period of five years. Toward the end of the lease term, which ended on November 4, 1927, the parties were negotiating an extension but could not come to an agreement. Fetting did not vacate the premises at the end of the lease term but occupied the building until November 26, 1927. After vacating the premises, Fetting sent Waltz a check in the amount of one month’s rent under the expired lease. Waltz refused to accept the check except as a payment for the first month under a new one-year lease. Fetting did not reoccupy the premises. Waltz tried to relet the premises but was unable to do so until January 1929. Waltz sued Fetting seeking to recover the other 11 months’ rent under the claimed one-year renewal lease. The trial court ruled in favor of Waltz. Fetting appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Parke, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.