A&H Sportswear, Inc. v. Victoria’s Secret Stores, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
237 F.3d 198 (2000)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
A&H Sportswear, Inc. (A&H) (plaintiff) was a major swimwear producer. A&H created a line of swimsuits called “Miraclesuit” swimwear. A&H registered the mark “Miraclesuit.” Victoria’s Secret Stores, Inc. (Victoria’s Secret) (defendant) was a major lingerie manufacturer with a lingerie line called “The Miracle Bra.” Victoria’s Secret later introduced a swimwear line under the name “The Miracle Bra.” Victoria’s Secret had a housemark, which was Victoria’s Secret’s general manufacturing mark for all its products. The Miracle Bra swimwear included both: (1) the Victoria’s Secret’s housemark next to The Miracle Bra mark and (2) a disclaimer stating that The Miracle Bra swimwear was unrelated to the Miraclesuit. A&H sued Victoria’s Secret for trademark infringement, alleging: (1) direct confusion for consumers who incorrectly believed that A&H was the source of The Miracle Bra swimwear; and (2) reverse confusion for consumers incorrectly believed that Victoria’s Secret was the source of A&H’s Miraclesuit. The district court ruled for Victoria’s Secret on the direct-confusion claim, finding that Victoria’s Secret’s use of the disclaimer in conjunction with its The Miracle Bra swimwear mark weighed against a likelihood of direct confusion. The court dismissed the reverse-confusion claim, holding that reverse confusion is not a distinct basis for a claim under the Lanham Act. A&H appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Becker, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 967,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.
