A & M Produce Co. v. FMC Corp.
California Court of Appeal
135 Cal. App. 3d 473, 186 Cal. Rptr. 114 (1982)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
A & M Produce Co. (A&M) (plaintiff) was a farm. A&M wanted to begin farming tomatoes. A&M solicited a bid from FMC Corp. (FMC) (defendant) for the necessary equipment. A&M signed FMC’s form contract that disclaimed warranties and consequential damages. FMC delivered the equipment, and A&M began to use the machinery to pick tomatoes. The machinery did not work properly and left A&M with a failed crop. FMC refused to give A&M a refund. A&M sued FMC for breach of warranty. The trial court held that the form-contract provisions disclaiming warranties and consequential damages were unconscionable, and excluded the disclaimers from the jury’s consideration. The jury returned a verdict in favor of A&M. FMC appealed, arguing the trial court erred in holding the disclaimers were unconscionable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiener, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.