A.P. Green Export Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
284 F.2d 383 (1960)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
A.P. Green Export Company (Green) (plaintiff), headquartered in Missouri, exported brick to Latin America and Canada. The sales contracts between Green and its customers stipulated that title to the goods and responsibility for their shipment belonged to Green until delivery of the goods to the customer. The retention of title until delivery served a legitimate business purpose because an exporter’s retention of title until delivery permitted an exporter greater control over its shipments while en route to their destination and allowed the shipper to make insurance claims regarding the goods in the United States if a loss occurred abroad. Green’s goods were generally priced CIF, which meant that Green, as the seller, was responsible for the cost of freight, or shipment, and insurance. The insurance policies purchased by Green covered the goods that it shipped abroad for several days after arrival. The documents indicating ownership of the goods were transferred to the buyer upon acceptance of the delivery. Green claimed that the income from sale of its goods was a foreign source and, accordingly, Green was entitled to favorable tax treatment of its income derived from such goods. The United States government took the position that title of the goods passed in the United States, so Green’s income was subject to treatment as domestic income with respect to income taxes. Green sued the United States for a tax refund.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.