Aames Capital Corporation v. Interstate Bank of Oak Forest
Illinois Appellate Court
734 N.E.2d 493 (2000)
Aames Capital Corporation (Aames) (plaintiff), the assignee of a mortgage that was refinanced to pay the balance of prior mortgages, sued in foreclosure after the borrowers defaulted on the loan. Interstate Bank of Oak Forest (Interstate) (defendant) claimed that its judgment lien, which was recorded before Aames became the assignee, took priority over the Aames mortgage. Patrick and Diane Wangler obtained the original mortgage in 1986 from Hinsdale Federal Savings and Loan. Federal Savings and Loan recorded the mortgage that same year and assigned it to Standard Federal Bank (Standard). The Wanglers subsequently signed four junior mortgages with Suburban Bank of Elmhurst (Suburban). The four mortgages were recorded in 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991. In 1996, Interstate, with knowledge of the outstanding Standard and Suburban mortgages, recorded a judgment against the Wanglers in the amount of $75,891.06. That year, the Wanglers refinanced the mortgages with Pacific Thrift and Loan Company (Pacific) to pay the balance of the debt owed to Standard and Suburban. Pacific paid the prior mortgagees $174,000 and took a mortgage on the Wangler property. Pacific recorded the mortgage and assigned the mortgage to Aames. In 1997, the Wanglers defaulted on the note, and Aames sued in foreclosure. Interstate moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Interstate judgment took priority over the Aames mortgage because the judgment was recorded before the Aames mortgage was recorded. Aames claimed that the Aames mortgage took priority, because Aames was subrogated to the rights of Standard and Suburban, the original mortgagees. Interstate countered that subrogation could not exist absent express agreement. The trial court held that Interstate’s judgment lien, which had been recorded earlier in time, took priority over the Aames mortgage. The court granted summary judgment to Interstate. Aames appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Geiger, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.