Aames Funding Corp. v. Sharpe
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2004 WL 2418284 (2004)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Rosie Sharpe (defendant) took out a loan and entered into a home-improvement contract with Aames Funding Corporation (Aames) (plaintiff) and its agents. The agreement included an arbitration provision stating that the parties would arbitrate all disputes related to the agreement; however, Aames reserved the right to litigate foreclosure proceedings, bankruptcy applications, or any of Aames’s claims for damages due to Sharpe’s default. A dispute arose regarding the cash amount Sharpe was supposed to receive from the home-improvement loan, and Sharpe filed suit in Pennsylvania state court against Aames and its agents. Aames filed a petition in federal district court to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), citing the arbitration provision in the home-improvement contract. Sharpe argued that the agreement was unenforceable due to unconscionability.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Padova, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.