Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • A
  • Abbott v. Nampa School DistrictAbbott v. Nampa School District
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Abbott v. Nampa School District

Idaho Supreme Court
808 P.2d 1289 (1991)


Facts

Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District held an irrigation ditch easement through two parcels of land, one owned by Dan and Joanne Abbott (plaintiffs), and an adjoining parcel owned by the Nampa School District (defendant). As part of its plan to construct a new school building on its property, the school district obtained a license from the irrigation district to transfer the irrigation line into an underground pipe, removing the ditch. Under the license agreement, the school district also planned to construct a concrete inlet and erect a safety screen, and would take on the project at its own expense. The proposal was to make such alterations to the irrigation ditch where it ran through both the school district’s and the Abbotts’ properties. The school district moved forward with the planned construction on the Abbotts’ property without obtaining the Abbotts’ permission. The Abbotts filed suit to stop construction, contending that the irrigation district was not permitted to grant a license to the school district to make the alterations on the Abbotts’ property, and that the burden of the easement initially granted to the irrigation district was improperly enlarged to the detriment of the Abbott’s property. The district court found in the school district’s favor, concluding that the planned modifications were within the bounds of the irrigation district’s easement, and so did not constitute an unreasonable increase in the burden of the easement on the Abbotts’ land. The Abbotts appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boyle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial