Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Abrams v. Illinois College of Podiatric Medicine

Illinois Appellate Court
395 N.E.2d 1061 (1979)


Facts

Jonathan Abrams (plaintiff) was a student at the Illinois College of Podiatric Medicine (College) (defendant) for one year. During his first semester at the College, Abrams failed Physiology 101. The College allowed him to retake the exam, but Abrams failed again. The College then removed Physiology 203 from Abrams’s second-semester schedule, telling Abrams that, if he passed all the classes in his reduced workload, Abrams could retake Physiology 101 in the summer. Throughout the year, Abrams talked with College representatives about his struggle to keep up with the customary workload. The College reassured Abrams that the College would make an effort to help Abrams through. The student handbook said that it was “desirable” for professors to keep their students up-to-date about their progress. The handbook also said that students “should be” told how they were doing shortly after mid-terms and given recommendations to help them improve. Abrams’s professors, however, did not update him about his progress or standing throughout the school year. Ultimately, Abrams failed two of his second-semester courses and the College expelled him. Abrams then sued the College for breach of contract, arguing that the handbook’s language and the College representatives’ statements to him created a binding contract. The trial court ruled in favor of the College. Abrams appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.