AC Acquisitions Corp. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.
Delaware Chancery Court
519 A.2d 103 (1986)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc.; Gruss Petroleum Corp.; and Gruss Partners (collectively, BS/G) (plaintiffs) were shareholders of Anderson, Clayton & Co. (AC) (defendant). BS/G formed AC Acquisitions Corp. as a vehicle for a proposed acquisition of AC, which included a tender offer of $56 per share of AC’s stock, conditioned on BS/G’s acquisition of at least 51 percent of the stock. The AC board of directors wished to avoid the BS/G tender offer. AC made a self-tender offer at $60 per share. BS/G brought an action in the Delaware Chancery Court to enjoin AC’s self-tender offer, which BS/G claimed was economically coercive and a breach of the fiduciary duties of care and loyalty owed to the AC shareholders. It was undisputed in the record that effectuation of the self-tender would cause AC’s stock to decline—possibly to as low as $23 per share.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Allen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.