Academic Center of Law and Business v. Minister of Finance

2605/05 [19 November 2009] (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Academic Center of Law and Business v. Minister of Finance

Israel High Court of Justice
2605/05 [19 November 2009] (2009)

KS

Facts

The Prisons Ordinance Amendment Law (no. 28) established for the first time that an Israeli prison would be operated and managed not by the state of Israel but by a private entity. The amendment required that the government of Israel take specific measures to supervise the private prison corporation and its employees. The amendment also restricted the actions the private entity and its employees could take against individuals imprisoned at the corrections facility. The Academic Center of Law and Business (the center) (plaintiff) and others challenged the amendment’s constitutionality, arguing that the amendment disproportionally impacted the rights of prisoners by transferring the state’s power to imprison to a private entity. Furthermore, the center complained that the human rights of imprisoned individuals would be at greater risk of violation in a privately run prison than in a state-operated corrections facility. The Minister of Finance, the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament), and the private company that awarded the concession for the prison (collectively, the defendants) argued that the privatization of a prison was constitutional as other governmental activities had already been privatized, other countries allowed for privatized prison systems, and the human rights of prisoners would be better protected in the privately operated facility because of the strict contractual requirements required of the prison operated.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beinisch, J.)

Concurrence (Naor, J.)

Dissent (Levy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership