Academic Center of Law and Business v. Minister of Finance
Israel High Court of Justice
2605/05 [19 November 2009] (2009)
- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
The Prisons Ordinance Amendment Law (no. 28) established for the first time that an Israeli prison would be operated and managed not by the state of Israel but by a private entity. The amendment required that the government of Israel take specific measures to supervise the private prison corporation and its employees. The amendment also restricted the actions the private entity and its employees could take against individuals imprisoned at the corrections facility. The Academic Center of Law and Business (the center) (plaintiff) and others challenged the amendment’s constitutionality, arguing that the amendment disproportionally impacted the rights of prisoners by transferring the state’s power to imprison to a private entity. Furthermore, the center complained that the human rights of imprisoned individuals would be at greater risk of violation in a privately run prison than in a state-operated corrections facility. The Minister of Finance, the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament), and the private company that awarded the concession for the prison (collectively, the defendants) argued that the privatization of a prison was constitutional as other governmental activities had already been privatized, other countries allowed for privatized prison systems, and the human rights of prisoners would be better protected in the privately operated facility because of the strict contractual requirements required of the prison operated.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Beinisch, J.)
Concurrence (Naor, J.)
Dissent (Levy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.