Accentuate Ltd. v. Asigra, Inc.

[2009] EWHC (QB) 2655 (2009)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Accentuate Ltd. v. Asigra, Inc.

England and Wales High Court of Justice
[2009] EWHC (QB) 2655 (2009)

Facts

Accentuate Ltd. (plaintiff), an English company, contracted with Asigra, Inc. (defendant), a Canadian company, to distribute Asigra’s software and hardware. The agreement between the parties stated that the law of Ontario, Canada, controlled and that any disputes would be settled by arbitration in Toronto, Canada. A dispute arose, and Asigra commenced arbitration proceedings in Toronto. The arbitral tribunal determined that compensation pursuant to an EU law, the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 (the regulations), was not available to Accentuate because Ontario law applied. Thereafter, Accentuate filed an action in England to claim the compensation due to it under the regulations. Asigra moved for a stay of the English proceedings pursuant to England’s Arbitration Act 1996. The district court stayed the proceedings in favor of the arbitration, determining that the court did not have jurisdiction. Accentuate appealed, arguing that its claims to compensation under the regulations did not come within the purview of the arbitration clause, because the regulations were a mandatory law that could not be circumvented by choice-of-law provisions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tugendhat, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership