From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc.
Illinois Court of Appeals
112 N.E.3d 1054 (2018)
Kimberly Accettura and Adam Wozniak (plaintiffs) bought a new RV from Vacationland, Inc. (defendant) on April 19, 2014. In June, Accettura and Wozniak discovered a leaking window, and Vacationland repaired it at no charge. In July, the couple discovered a second leak during a trip that damaged the walls and caused electrical failure. The couple brought the RV back on July 14, 2014. Vacationland returned it to the manufacturer for repair, but could not give a clear estimate how long repairs would take. Accettura and Wozniak called the manufacturer, who directed them back to the dealership. On August 2, 2014, the couple verbally revoked acceptance of the RV. The manufacturer completed repairs and returned the RV to the dealership September 23, and the dealership called the couple to come pick it up. Five days later, the couple’s attorney sent Vacationland a letter revoking acceptance of the RV, but Vacationland did not return their money. The couple sued, alleging the RV had multiple continuing problems and that they had properly revoked acceptance under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Over two years later, Vacationland moved for summary judgment, arguing that the couple did not afford it a reasonable opportunity to cure, making their revocation ineffective. The couple countered that a genuine issue of fact remained as to whether the RV was repaired within a reasonable amount of time. The trial court granted Vacationland summary judgment, finding the couple revoked acceptance sometime before August 2, 2104, which did not give Vacationland a reasonable time to cure. The couple appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McLaren, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.