Accounts Management, Inc. v. Litchfield

576 N.W.2d 233 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Accounts Management, Inc. v. Litchfield

South Dakota Supreme Court
576 N.W.2d 233 (1998)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Fredrick Klusman and Claudia Caswell (defendant) applied for a marriage license on December 20, 1984, and were married four days later by an ordained Presbyterian minister in a ceremony in front of their friends and relatives. The marriage license was never recorded. On October 14, 1986, Klusman had a severe heart attack and was admitted for seven days to the intensive-care unit of St. Joseph Hospital. Caswell signed Klusman’s admissions forms as “Claudia Klusman, wife.” Klusman suffered severe and irreversible brain damage because of the heart attack, and Caswell assumed guardianship of his person and affairs until his death in 1989. St. Joseph billed Klusman $14,170 for his care, and Caswell made consistent monthly payments for eight years before stopping in August 1994. Accounts Management Inc. (AMI) (plaintiff) took over the debt and sued Caswell for the remaining balance. The circuit court granted AMI’s motion for summary judgment, and Caswell appealed, alleging she had no responsibility for Klusman’s medical bill because their marriage was invalid.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Konenkamp, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership