Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools v. DeVos

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
303 F. Supp.3d 77 (2018)


Only schools accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association qualify to receive federal student aid under the Higher Education Act (HEA). The secretary of the U.S. Department of Education (defendant) decides which accrediting agencies to recognize. HEA criteria include using effective standards to evaluate and monitor the quality of a school’s education, and performance indicators like student recruitment, admissions, and placement. Multiple investigations and lawsuits emerged accusing independent for-profit schools like ITT Technical and Corinthian of using fraudulent performance data and predatory practices. Those schools were accredited by the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS) (plaintiff). During its recognition status review, the department asked ACICS a series of questions. Part I asked about the problem schools. Part II asked how ACICS complied with HEA recognition standards, particularly as applied to the problem schools. ACICS responded to Part II with 36,000 pages of documents including a narrative, enforcement actions it initiated against dozens of schools, the problem schools’ accreditation applications, evaluations of those applications, and emails with the schools. The department report found that ACICS knew the problem schools committed widespread placement-rate fraud but failed to report it to the department. After reviewing the report and hearing both sides, the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity voted to revoke ACICS’s recognition. ACICS appealed to the secretary of education, who found ACICS noncompliant with at least five recognition criteria without reviewing the 36,000 pages submitted. ACICS sued for judicial review of the secretary’s decision. Both sides moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Walton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 496,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 496,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial