Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
521 F.2d 288 (1975)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Accuracy in Media (AIM) (plaintiff) filed two complaints with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) against the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), alleging that PBS distributed two programs to its member stations dealing with sex education and the American criminal justice system that were not balanced or objective, in violation of the Fairness Doctrine and 47 U.S.C. § 396(g)(1)(A) of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 (PBA). The PBA created the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which funded the alleged offending programs. The PBA required that CPB’s programming strictly adhere to its objectivity and balance requirements. AIM dropped its Fairness Doctrine claim after the FCC concluded that PBS had not violated it. AIM claimed that because the PBS programs were funded by the CPB, those programs also had to adhere to the PBA objectivity and balance requirements. The FCC received public comments then decided that it lacked jurisdiction to enforce the mandate of the PBA against CPB. AIM appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bazelon, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.