Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

521 F.2d 288 (1975)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
521 F.2d 288 (1975)

Facts

Accuracy in Media (AIM) (plaintiff) filed two complaints with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) against the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), alleging that PBS distributed two programs to its member stations dealing with sex education and the American criminal justice system that were not balanced or objective, in violation of the Fairness Doctrine and 47 U.S.C. § 396(g)(1)(A) of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 (PBA). The PBA created the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which funded the alleged offending programs. The PBA required that CPB’s programming strictly adhere to its objectivity and balance requirements. AIM dropped its Fairness Doctrine claim after the FCC concluded that PBS had not violated it. AIM claimed that because the PBS programs were funded by the CPB, those programs also had to adhere to the PBA objectivity and balance requirements. The FCC received public comments then decided that it lacked jurisdiction to enforce the mandate of the PBA against CPB. AIM appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bazelon, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership