From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Acosta v. Byrum et al.
North Carolina Court of Appeals
180 N.C. App. 562, 638 S.E.2d 246 (2006)
Heather Acosta (plaintiff) was a patient of Psychiatric Associates and also an employee of the facility between September 2003 and early 2004. Dr. David R. Faber, II (defendant), owner of Psychiatric Associates, gave his medical access number to the facility’s office manager, Robin Byrum (defendant), numerous times between December 2003 and September 2004. Byrum used that number to obtain the confidential psychiatric and medical records of Acosta which she distributed to third parties without Acosta’s consent. Acosta claimed that Byrum expressed a deep dislike for her around that time. As a result of the third-party disclosure, Acosta claimed she experienced severe emotional distress, humiliation, and anguish. Acosta brought suit against Byrum for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Acosta sued Faber for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Acosta alleged that Faber knew or should have known that his negligence would cause her severe emotional distress. In her complaint, Acosta relied upon the rules and regulations of University Health Systems, Roanoke Chowan Hospital, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), as evidence of the standard of care applicable to Faber. Faber filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, claiming Acosta’s negligence allegations and the applicable standard of care were insufficiently presented in her complaint. The trial court agreed and Acosta appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hunter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.