Adams v. Re/Max
Ohio Court of Appeals
111 N.E.3d 758 (2018)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Adria Adams (plaintiff) leased an apartment from Re/Max Property Management (Re/Max) (defendant) for 12 months. The lease contained a clause on holdover tenancy, which required 30-days’ notice by either party to terminate the lease. Adams paid a security deposit of $625, and monthly rent was set at $625. After the original lease term ended, Adams renewed the lease for another year with an expiration date of March 31, 2017. On March 9, 2017, Re/Max sent Adams a renewal letter, which presented Adams with four options. The options were to renew for an additional 12 months, to renew for an additional six months, to convert the lease to a month-to-month tenancy, or to submit written notice and vacate the property. The renewal letter did not specify a date by which Adams needed to respond. On April 26, 2017, Adams indicated that she planned to vacate the premises on May 1. After Adams returned the keys to Re/Max on April 29, Re/Max claimed that Adams had provided insufficient notice of termination of her tenancy, so it refused to return her security deposit. Adams sued Re/Max for the return of her security deposit. The trial court found that Adams was not required to provide 30-days’ notice to terminate her month-to-month tenancy because Re/Max failed to include a deadline in its renewal letter. Re/Max appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McCormack, J.)
Dissent (Kilbane, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 967,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

