Adams v. Re/Max

111 N.E.3d 758 (2018)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Adams v. Re/Max

Ohio Court of Appeals
111 N.E.3d 758 (2018)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Adria Adams (plaintiff) leased an apartment from Re/Max Property Management (Re/Max) (defendant) for 12 months. The lease contained a clause on holdover tenancy, which required 30-days’ notice by either party to terminate the lease. Adams paid a security deposit of $625, and monthly rent was set at $625. After the original lease term ended, Adams renewed the lease for another year with an expiration date of March 31, 2017. On March 9, 2017, Re/Max sent Adams a renewal letter, which presented Adams with four options. The options were to renew for an additional 12 months, to renew for an additional six months, to convert the lease to a month-to-month tenancy, or to submit written notice and vacate the property. The renewal letter did not specify a date by which Adams needed to respond. On April 26, 2017, Adams indicated that she planned to vacate the premises on May 1. After Adams returned the keys to Re/Max on April 29, Re/Max claimed that Adams had provided insufficient notice of termination of her tenancy, so it refused to return her security deposit. Adams sued Re/Max for the return of her security deposit. The trial court found that Adams was not required to provide 30-days’ notice to terminate her month-to-month tenancy because Re/Max failed to include a deadline in its renewal letter. Re/Max appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCormack, J.)

Dissent (Kilbane, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Property

Key Terms