Adams v. Trustees of the University of North Carolina-Wilmington
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
640 F.3d 550 (2011)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
In 1993, Adams (plaintiff) became employed as an assistant professor of criminology at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington (UNCW) (defendant). Over the next five years, Adams published several articles, won faculty awards, and received strong teaching evaluations. In 1998, Adams was promoted to associate professor, a tenured position. In 2000, Adams became a Christian and began vocalizing his views on political and social issues. Adams wrote regular columns, appeared as a commentator on television and radio, and published a book. Adams’s columns and appearances involved multiple topics, including civil rights, sex, abortion, homosexuality, and morality, to name a few. In 2004, Adams applied for a promotion to full professor. In his application, Adams included not only his academic awards and peer-reviewed publications but also his columns and other writings and appearances he had made since becoming a Christian, including his book. The senior faculty in Adams’s department reviewed his application and discussed his most recent writings, focusing on how to evaluate those writings because they were not peer-reviewed or traditional academic writings related to his discipline. The senior faculty and department head did not recommend Adams for promotion, citing his lack of scholarly research and publication since his last promotion in 1998. Adams filed a lawsuit against UNCW, alleging retaliation and viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment to UNCW, and Adams appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Agee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.