Logourl black

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena

United States Supreme Court
515 U.S. 200 (1995)


Facts

A federal government program provided a financial incentive for any prime contractors who hired subcontractors controlled by “socially and economically disadvantaged individuals” in the performance of federal government contracts. Individuals qualifying as “socially and economically disadvantaged” were presumed to include racial minorities. In 1989, the Central Federal Lands Highway Division (CFLHD) awarded a prime contract for a construction project to Mountain Gravel & Construction Company (Mountain Gravel). Mountain Gravel then accepted bids from subcontractors for the guardrail portion of the project. Adarand Constructors, Inc. (“Adarand”) (plaintiff) submitted the lowest bid. However, Mountain Gravel awarded the subcontract to Gonzales Construction Company (“Gonzales”), a business controlled by “socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.” Mountain Gravel stated that it would not have awarded the subcontract to Gonzales were it not for the financial incentive it received under the federal government program. Adarand brought suit against Pena (defendant), the Secretary of Transportation, in federal district court. The district court and the court of appeals ruled in favor of Pena, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Scalia, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Thomas, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 73,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 10,433 briefs - keyed to 136 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now