Adeyeye v. Heartland Sweeteners, LLC

721 F.3d 444 (2013)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Adeyeye v. Heartland Sweeteners, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
721 F.3d 444 (2013)

Facts

In July and September 2019, lawful permanent resident Sikiru Adeyeye (plaintiff) submitted two requests for authorized leave to return to Nigeria to participate in his father’s funeral ceremony, to be held in October 2019. Adeyeye’s requests indicated that his attendance was required and that as the oldest son, he had to perform certain burial rites over the course of four to five weeks, which included animal sacrifice, so that his siblings would not die also. Adeyeye sought to use a mix of vacation time and unpaid leave. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), if an employee notified an employer of the need to take time off in order to participate in religious services or practices, a covered employer had to provide reasonable accommodation to the employee’s request if providing the accommodation would not present an undue hardship on the employer. Title VII’s protections extended to religious practices that might be less familiar in the modern American context. Despite Title VII’s prohibition on religious discrimination by employers, Adeyeye’s employer, Heartland Sweeteners, LLC (Heartland) (defendant), denied Adeyeye’s leave requests and fired him after he took unauthorized leave and returned to work. Adeyeye sued Heartland for failing to offer an accommodation of his religion. At trial, Heartland argued that Adeyeye’s requests were insufficient to place Heartland on notice of the religious nature of his request for time off. A district court granted summary judgment to Heartland. Adeyeye appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership