Logourl black

Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.

United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 144 (1970)


Facts

On August 14, 1964, Sandra Adickes (plaintiff), a white schoolteacher, was refused service at the lunch counter at S.H. Kress & Co. (Kress) (defendant) in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, because she was accompanied by several of her African American students. After Adickes left the store, she was arrested on a charge of vagrancy. Adickes brought suit against Kress, alleging violation of her equal protection rights. She alleged two counts: (1) that she was refused service because she was in the company of African Americans, and there was a custom in the community of segregation in eating places; and (2) that the refusal of service and arrest were the result of a conspiracy between Kress and Hattiesburg police. At trial, Adickes did not prove that there had been other instances of a white person being refused service because he was accompanied by African Americans, and therefore failed to establish a custom, so the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Kress on the first count. The second count was dismissed on summary judgment before trial. The court of appeals affirmed with regards to both counts, Adickes appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 85,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,053 briefs - keyed to 161 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now