Adler v. Fred Lind Manor
Supreme Court of Washington
103 P.3d 773 (2004)
Adler (plaintiff) immigrated to the United States from Poland in 1990. In June 1992, Fred Lind Manor (Fred Lind) (defendant) hired Adler for a maintenance position. In 1995, Fred Lind required all employees to sign an arbitration agreement as a condition of their continued employment. In 2001, Adler hurt himself while at work. Adler’s doctor advised him to perform only “light duty” thereafter. Adler subsequently suffered additional work-related injuries. In June 2002, Fred Lind fired Adler because he was unable to perform his job. After pursuing and losing his claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Adler filed a complaint with the trial court. In its answer, Fred Lind argued that Adler was required to submit his claim to arbitration. Fred Lind moved to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. The trial court granted Fred Lind’s motion. The Supreme Court of Washington granted review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bridge, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.