From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
Adler v. George
England and Wales High Court of Justice
 2 QB 7, 9 (1964)
On May 11, 1963, Frank Adler entered into Marham Royal Air Force station, which was a place of prohibited entry. He was charged and convicted with violating Official Secrets Act 1920, 10 & 11 Geo 5 c 75, § 3, which stated that “No person in the vicinity of any prohibited place shall obstruct . . . any member of His Majesty’s forces” engaged in his duties. The court found that the defendant had obstructed a member of the Royal Air Force while in the station. Adler appealed his conviction, arguing that the wording of the statute only prohibited conduct “in the vicinity” of the station and so could not be violated by anyone on the premises of the station itself.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.