Supreme Court of California
823 P.2d 1216 (1992)
Kari S. gave birth to a boy, Kelsey S., on May 18, 1988. She sought to put the boy up for adoption. Kelsey’s father, Rickie M., was not married to Kari. He wanted to raise Kelsey and therefore objected to the adoption. On May 20, Rickie filed a petition to establish his paternity and for custody of Kelsey. Four days later, Steven and Suzanne A., the prospective adoptive parents, filed a petition to adopt Kelsey. The court consolidated the petitions of Rickie, Steven, and Suzanne. It awarded temporary custody of Kelsey to his mother, Kari, and ordered that she live in a shelter for unwed mothers. Rickie was granted supervised visitation with the child; Steven and Suzanne were granted unsupervised visitation. Apart from the court-ordered visitation, Kari did not allow Rickie to have contact with Kelsey. After considering the matter, the court held that Rickie was not the “presumed father” of Kelsey, notwithstanding his clear paternity. Because he was not the “presumed father,” Rickie lacked a statutory right to withhold consent to Kelsey’s adoption. Rickie appealed unsuccessfully to the Court of Appeal. He appealed again.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 199,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.