Adrian v. Rabinowitz
New Jersey Supreme Court
116 N.J.L. 586, 186 A. 29 (1936)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
The defendant lessor and the plaintiff lessee signed a lease agreement on April 30, 1934. The lease specified that the lessee would lease the property for six months beginning on June 15, 1934 for the operation of a shoe business. The lease contained an express covenant stating that the lessee would hold and enjoy the property for the specified term. However, the lessor’s previous tenant did not vacate the premises by June 15, requiring the lessor to file proceedings to dispossess the previous tenant. As a result, the lessee did not take possession until July 9, 1934. The lessee brought suit alleging the lessor’s breach of his obligation to deliver actual possession of the property at the beginning of the leased term. The district court judge ruled in favor of the lessee and awarded him $500 in damages for his loss from the resale of seasonable merchandise, in addition to $25 to offset his rent for the period he was deprived of possession.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Heher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.