Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Advantec Group, Inc. v. Edwin’s Plumbing Co.

California Court of Appeal
63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 195 (2007)


Facts

Advantec Group, Inc. (Advantec) (plaintiff) hired Edwin’s Plumbing Co. (Edwin’s) (defendant) to provide plumbing services and materials for an apartment-building project. Advantec ultimately sued Edwin’s for breach of contract, seeking damages of $168,476.40. Two months prior to trial, Edwin’s filed a cross-complaint, also alleging breach of contract. The cross-complaint alleged that Edwin’s was a licensed plumbing contractor in California. Advantec’s answer to the cross-complaint was a general denial of all cross-complaint allegations that did not specifically challenge Edwin’s license status. During the jury trial, Edwin’s attempted to provide testimony that it was properly licensed during the contract’s term. However, Advantec objected and insisted on a verified license certificate. The trial court sustained the objection, and Edwin’s requested a continuance to obtain the verified certificate. However, this occurred on day four of the jury trial, and the trial was almost over. The verified certificate could take two weeks to get. The trial court denied the continuance and granted a nonsuit on Edwin’s cross-complaint. The jury awarded Advantec $46,200 in damages. Edwin’s appealed to the California Court of Appeal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Willwhite, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.