Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. Campbell
United States Supreme Court
337 U.S. 521 (1949)
- Written by Alex Hall, JD
Facts
Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge No. 727 (the union) (plaintiff) was the collective-bargaining agent of the employees of Lockheed Aircraft Corporation (Lockheed). A collective-bargaining agreement with Lockheed that addressed standard conditions of employment was in effect when Kirk was employed. Following military service in World War II, Kirk was reemployed by Lockheed, in accordance with the Selective Training and Service Act (the act). During Kirk’s military service, the collective-bargaining agreement between the union and Lockheed was modified so that union chairmen were deemed to have top seniority during layoffs, regardless of how long they had been employed. After Kirk’s reemployment, he was laid off for one month, while union chairmen who had less time with the company were retained. Kirk was reinstated but was not paid for his period of unemployment. Kirk brought suit for payment during the month of his layoff, and the district court entered judgment for Kirk. The union appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed on the grounds that § 8 of the act prohibited ignoring length of employment of union chairmen when deciding layoffs pursuant to a collective-bargaining agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.