AES Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
325 F.3d 174 (2003)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
AES Corporation (plaintiff) agreed to buy a subsidiary of Dow Chemical Company (Dow) (defendant). AES expected to reap a $31 million profit from the deal. The sale contract contained a nonreliance clause stipulating that (1) Dow gave no warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of representations made in the contract, (2) AES would hold Dow harmless for any inaccuracies or incompleteness in those representations, and (3) AES relied on no representations other than those contained in the sale contract itself. After the sale, AES discovered that it had purchased a $70 million money loser. AES sued Dow under Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10b-5, alleging that Dow knowingly withheld information that would have contradicted key contractual representations on which AES had reasonably and detrimentally relied. The federal district court accepted Dow’s defense that the contract’s nonreliance clause barred AES’s claim as a matter of law and dismissed the case. AES appealed to the Third Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stapleton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
