Afroyim v. Rusk
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 253 (1967)
Afroyim (plaintiff) was born in Poland in 1893 and immigrated to the United States in 1912. He became a naturalized American citizen in 1926. In 1950, he travelled to Israel and voted in an election for the Knesset, Israel’s parliamentary body. When he applied for a passport renewal in 1960, it was denied on the basis that he lost his American citizenship through Section 401(e) of the Nationality Act of 1940 when he voted in a foreign election. Afroyim then brought an action against U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk (defendant) in federal district court, seeking a declaratory judgment that Section 401(e) violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The lower courts held for the government. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J)
Dissent (Harlan, J)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.