Ag Services, Inc. v. Empfield
Nebraska Supreme Court
587 N.W.2d 871 (1999)
- Written by Douglas Halasz, JD
Facts
In November of 1994, Ag Services of America, Inc. (Ag Services) (plaintiff) loaned C.M.R., Inc. (C.M.R.) money and took a security interest in, among other things, C.M.R.’s farm products, inventory, and crops. In December of 1994, Ag Services filed financing statements covering its interest, which described certain crops growing or to be grown on land owned by Darrell E. Empfield (defendant). In April of 1995, C.M.R. leased land from Empfield, which C.M.R. agreed to pay for in two installments. As security, Empfield took an interest in the crops growing on the leased premises during the lease term. Empfield never filed a financing statement or other document regarding his interest. C.M.R. defaulted on its lease agreement with Empfield by not paying the second installment. Accordingly, Empfield sold certain crops that C.M.R. had stored on the leased premises. Thereafter, C.M.R. defaulted on its loan agreement with Ag Services. Ag Services sued Empfield for, among other things, conversion of the crops that Empfield sold. Specifically, Ag Services argued that its perfected security interest in the crops had priority over Empfield’s interest. Ag Services moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Empfield appealed and sought equitable relief.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.