Aguilera-Enriquez v. INS

516 F.2d 565 (1975)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Aguilera-Enriquez v. INS

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
516 F.2d 565 (1975)

  • Written by Christopher Bova, JD

Facts

Aguilera-Enriquez (plaintiff) was born in Mexico but became a legal permanent resident in the United States in 1967. He traveled to Mexico in 1971 and was arrested for possession of cocaine at the border when he tried to return to the United States. He pleaded guilty and was placed on probation. Because of his conviction, the Immigration and Naturalization Service began deportation proceedings pursuant to section 241(a)(11) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. At the hearing, the immigration judge refused to appoint counsel as Aguilera-Enriquez had requested, and ordered him deported. Aguilera-Enriquez hired counsel who filed a motion in the district court to withdraw his guilty plea and filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals. The Board dismissed the appeal, and Aguilera-Enriquez then appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, arguing that he had the right to appointed counsel during the deportation proceedings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Celebrezze, J.)

Dissent (DeMascio, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership