Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp.
Louisiana Supreme Court
908 So. 2d 1 (2005)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Dave Aguillard (plaintiff) attended a public auction of real estate property at which he was required to sign the auction terms and conditions, confirming that he read, understood, and would be bound by the provisions. The terms and conditions were prepared by Auction Management Corporation (defendant), the auction’s closing coordinator. The document was two pages long and contained, among its provisions, a single-sentence paragraph describing an arbitration clause. The arbitration clause was printed in the same font type and size as the rest of the provisions. Aguillard submitted a winning bid on a property and was required to sign a real estate sales agreement. The property seller (defendant) refused Aguillard’s bid and refused to close or execute the sales agreement. The seller submitted a counteroffer, which Aguillard refused. Aguillard sued in federal district court to enforce the sales agreement against Auction Management, the property seller, and the auctioneer (defendant). Auction Management filed to stay proceedings and compel arbitration, claiming that the auction terms and arbitration clause governed the dispute. The district court denied the motion, and Auction Management appealed to the Third Circuit. The court affirmed the ruling, finding that the contract was adhesionary and lacked mutuality because the font was small, the form did not distinguish the arbitration clause, and the parties’ bargaining power was unequal. Auction Management appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Knoll, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.