Ahrenholz v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
219 F.3d 674 (2000)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Ahrenholz (plaintiff) sued the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (Board) (defendant) in federal district court, alleging that the school’s termination of his employment was retaliation for his exercise of free speech protected by the First Amendment. The Board moved for summary judgment, which the court denied upon concluding that Ahrenholz had established a prima facie case against the Board. The Board sought to appeal the denial of summary judgment on an interlocutory basis. The district court certified to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that an interlocutory appeal was warranted under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), noting in particular that the case would immediately end if the Board were granted summary judgment. The Board petitioned the Seventh Circuit to hear its appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.