Ahrenholz v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
219 F.3d 674 (2000)
Ahrenholz (plaintiff) sued the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (Board) (defendant) in federal district court, alleging that the school’s termination of his employment was retaliation for his exercise of free speech protected by the First Amendment. The Board moved for summary judgment, which the court denied upon concluding that Ahrenholz had established a prima facie case against the Board. The Board sought to appeal the denial of summary judgment on an interlocutory basis. The district court certified to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that an interlocutory appeal was warranted under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), noting in particular that the case would immediately end if the Board were granted summary judgment. The Board petitioned the Seventh Circuit to hear its appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.