From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Ainsworth v. Century Supply Co.
Illinois Appellate Court
693 N.E.2d 510 (1998)
Facts
Charles Ainsworth (plaintiff) was a tile installer. Tom Parks, the sales manager of Century Supply Co. (Century) (defendant), which sold ceramic tile, hired Ainsworth to install tile. Ainsworth agreed to allow Parks to videotape him installing tile so Parks could distribute the video to Century’s customers. Later, Century hired TCI of Illinois (TCI) (defendant) to make a commercial for Century. TCI used the video of Ainsworth installing tile in a small part of the commercial. The commercial was aired many times. After seeing the commercial, Ainsworth told Century to stop airing the commercial because he had not consented to be in it. Century at first denied that Ainsworth was in the commercial. Parks later testified he was shocked Ainsworth had complained because Parks thought most people would be thrilled to appear in a commercial. The commercial continued to air. Ainsworth sued Century and TCI for appropriation, requesting punitive damages. The trial court granted TCI’s motion to dismiss, holding that TCI did not commercially benefit from the commercial. The trial court then granted Century’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Ainsworth had not suffered actual damages. Ainsworth appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Inglis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.