Air Brake Systems, Inc. v. Mineta
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
357 F.3d 632 (2004)
Facts
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) was a federal agency reporting to Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta (defendant). An Air Brake Systems, Inc. (Air Brake) (plaintiff) customer asked NHTSA if an Air Brake braking system would comply with NHTSA Standard 121. In reply, NHTSA's Chief Counsel issued advisory letters that said: (1) legally, Standard 121 required wheel-slip controls and warning lights, and (2) the Air Brake system appeared to lack those features, meaning the system would not comply with Standard 121. By statute, only a formal NHTSA compliance review could determine if the Air Brake system actually lacked the required features. Without a formal compliance review, NHTSA posted the advisory letters on its website. Air Brake lost business and sued Mineta. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan decided that the advisory letters were not judicially reviewable final agency actions and dismissed the suit. Air Brake appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sutton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 710,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
