Air Line Pilots Association, International v. O'Neill
United States Supreme Court
499 U.S. 65 (1991)
The Air Line Pilots Association, International union (ALPA) (defendant) represented pilots who flew for Continental Airlines. In 1983, Continental reorganized in bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court approved Continental repudiating its collective-bargaining agreement with ALPA and cutting pilot salaries by more than half. ALPA called a strike that lasted over two years. Most of Continental’s 2000 pilots initially supported the strike, but about 400 crossed over and resumed work before the strike ended. Continental also hired replacements; by August 1985, it had about 1600 pilots, with 1000 still striking. Continental assigned pilots to new positions using a bid system. ALPA authorized strikers to submit bids, but Continental awarded all bid positions to working pilots. ALPA agreed to ending the strike if Continental reallocated the bid positions. Pilots could settle individual claims against Continental and participate in the reallocation or accept severance. Pilots who retained individual claims were eligible for positions only after those who settled. After reinstatement, pilots retained the same seniority rights they had before. O’Neill and other former striking pilots (plaintiffs) sued ALPA for breaching the duty of fair representation. The court found no evidence that ALPA discriminated, acted in bad faith, or accepted less than the best deal it could construct, and granted summary judgment. The appellate court reversed, emphasizing that ALPA settled on worse terms than voluntarily ending the strike. The Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.