From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...
Air Machine Com SRL v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
112 Cal. Rptr.3d 482 (2010)
Ponani Sukumar (plaintiff) and Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates (plaintiff) sued two Italian companies, Air Machine Com SRL (Air Machine) and Panatta Sport SRL (Panatta) (defendants), alleging breach of contract and other causes of action. Sukumar filed the complaint in California state court. Air Machine and Panatta filed a motion to quash the summons, claiming that the case should be dismissed because the California court lacked personal jurisdiction to issue rulings impacting these Italian companies. While the motion to quash was pending, Air Machine and Panatta jointly served a statutory settlement offer on Sukumar. This offer was made pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 998 and is often referred to as a 998 offer. The trial court determined that the act of serving the statutory settlement offer constituted a general appearance by Air Machine and Panatta and waived the issue of personal jurisdiction. Air Machine and Panatta then appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Benke, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.