Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. United States

330 F.2d 974 (1964)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims
330 F.2d 974 (1964)

RW

Facts

In 1957, the United States government (defendant) invited bids on the commercial operation of Washington National Airport parking lots, not including 32 metered parking spaces on airport roadways. After calculating its probable revenue based on the latest gross receipts reported by the agency in its bid invitation, Air Terminal Services, Inc. (Air Terminal) (plaintiff) submitted its bid and won the contract. About a year later, pursuant to its undisclosed 1956 plan for alleviating congestion on airport roadways, the government added 122 new metered parking spaces. In doing so, the government exercised its authority under a pre-1957 regulation, published in the Federal Register, giving it full authority over airport roadways. Because the new spaces were outside the Air Terminal lots, the government’s action cut deeply into Air Terminal’s revenue. Alleging that the government breached its warranty not to hinder Air Terminal’s contractual performance, the company sued the government in the Court of Claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Durfee, J.)

Dissent (Whitaker, J.)

Dissent (Jones, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership