Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Air Transport Association of America v. Department of Transportation

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
900 F.2d 369 (1990)


Facts

In 1987, Congress enacted a series of amendments to the Federal Aviation Act related to civil penalties. These amendments included an increase in the maximum penalty for a single safety violation and the establishment of a two-year long “demonstration program,” under which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had the authority to prosecute and adjudicate certain administrative policy actions. Nine months later, the FAA promulgated a body of regulations (“Penalty Rules”) to govern the adjudication of administrative civil penalty actions. The Penalty Rules established a schedule of civil penalties, as well as a comprehensive adjudicatory scheme for formal notice, settlement procedures, discovery, an adversary hearing before an administrative law judge, and an administrative appeal. The FAA promulgated the Penalty Rules without engaging in the notice and comment procedures outlined in § 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The FAA took the position that notice and comment procedures were not required because the Penalty Rules fell within an exemption to § 553’s notice and comment requirements for rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. The FAA also contended that the Penalty Rules fell within the “good cause” exemption to § 553’s notice and comment requirements.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Edwards, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Silberman, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.